Posts Tagged ‘Difference’

Quality Control Versus Quality Assurance – Is There A Difference?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

It’s not uncommon to hear the similar phrases quality control and quality assurance1 used interchangeably. This tendency, though a seemingly benign blunder, is actually a revealing reflection of an unhealthy quality management system.

What is quality control?

First of all, quality control is the “check” or the “end-of-the-immediate-task-at-hand” record or analysis that determines the acceptability or unacceptability of a product, a product plan, a product part, etc. Tasks related to quality control may include documented reviews, calibration, or additional types of measurable testing (sampling, etc.). Tasks related to quality control will reoccur more often than activities associated with quality assurance.

The Final Determination

Essentially, quality control is determined by the comparison of a product against the original specifications that were created before the product existed.

Who is involved with quality control?

Tasks related to quality control will usually require the involvement of those directly associated with the research, design or production of a product. An employee in charge of quality control related tasks is likely to report to his “local” department head and no further.

Quality Control Software: What functions should it perform?

Quality control software should be able to automate electronic “checks” and “tests” (best if done via a web-based system).

These checks may include the following quality control tasks:

• Customer complaints documentation.

• The record keeping of electronic forms or documents associated with step-by-step quality control processes.

• Forms routing.

• Automatic distribution and grading of training exams.

• Collaborative tasks.

What is quality assurance?

Quality assurance is more or less the determination of the processes that will determine the template and pattern of quality control tasks. Quality assurance assignments do not have to be measurable, although quality assurance evaluators will often use past experience or regulation as a guide for process determination.

The Final Determination

Essentially, quality assurance is determined by top-level policies, procedures, work instructions and governmental regulations.

Who is involved with quality assurance?

As opposed to quality control checks, quality assurance reports are more likely to be performed by managers, by corporate level administrators or 3rd party auditors.

Quality Assurance Software: What functions should it perform?

A quality assurance software solution should provide tracking and analytics (i.e. plus reporting features). A complete CAPA digital management solution is also a plus.

The most important function a quality assurance software solution however is flexibility and capability to be customized. After all, every quality assurance process determination will vary from company to company and a software solution should ideally be molded to the various needs of those companies.

The Importance of Distinguishing Quality Control from Quality Assurance Activities

It is important to treat the quality control tasks as separate from the quality assurance activities for the following reasons:

1) A product with continuous quality control checks may be entirely successful but the processes that govern those checks may still prove faulty (take too much time, too much revenue, etc.)

2) One person should not be performing both quality control and quality assurance assignments. Since quality assurance essentially controls the ebb and flow of quality control, having one person over both types of tasks is inherently a conflict of interest.

3) The two types of tasks are different. Why think about quality control and quality assurance as the same sort of process when quality control tasks are measured by specific details (i.e. numbers, specifications, etc.) and quality assurance activities are measured more by written policies, higher level work instructions or even by the opinions of management?

4) Some companies devote too much energy to quality control and some to quality assurance. Both processes must receive evaluation and management.

Conclusion

For life science and high-tech professionals an understanding of why quality control and quality assurance are important and how quality control and quality assurance tasks can best be accomplished are foundational building blocks for a strong regulated company.

1. [http://www.builderau.com.au/strategy/projectmanagement/soa/Quality-control-vs-quality-assurance/0],339028292,339191784,00.htm

Life Insurance – Little Details, Big Difference

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Hundred of thousands of people could soon find their life and critical-illness policies skyrocket due to inaccuracies on their policies regarding how much they drink and smoke.

Last year a survey of 5000 policyholders was carried out by a leading UK insurance company, of which around 2,500 policyholders have so far replied.

According to the results, over 1 in 14 of those surveyed had provided false information about their health and lifestyle when applying for life insurance. Some failed to declare how heavily they drank and others failed to declare past medical problems.

In most cases these oversights were adjudged to be unintentional, rather than an attempt to defraud.

One of the UK’s biggest insurers is considering writing to customers to find out if they disclosed their full medical history when they bought cover – including how much they drink and smoke.

And other insurers could soon follow suit, in an attempt to cut the number of rejected claims due to inaccurate medical information. One in 100 life insurance claims and one in five critical illness payouts are rejected on this basis. Nondisclosure during the life insurance quote application can be used to turn down a payment even when the details are irrelevant to the claim.

Policyholders who disclose something that may affect their risk of ill-health could see their premiums rise, or even cancelled in the worst cases.

Last summer, the Law Commission proposed reforms that would make it harder for insurers to try and avoid paying out on claims, even when the information disclosed by the policyholder was honest.

The commissions’ highly critical interim branded nondisclosure of information on a life insurance quote and the onus on disclosing little medical details during this as unfair to policyholders.

With a final report due soon, insurers are rushing to amend practices ahead of the commissions’ findings.

Some have already taken steps by offering partial payouts if the policyholder had accidentally failed to mention something on their application, even if the claim was not related. Others have introduced methods to help guide customers through the application process.